If you come across a Hollan Michigan Whore Bannach they like to believe the LIE that they were raised in a "christian": family
Self-deception is a trade-mark of a Holland Michigan whore..
Thomas Bannach: was the patriarch of this family and he promoted Promotion (marketing)
Marketing Key concepts
Brand management
Marketing ethics.. as Dean tripp said ..
Thomas Bannach didn't have any morals or ethics, he would do "what ever is-easest "
Marketing effectiveness..Every-one lies and cheats a -little-bit- so-it-is-"normal"
Market research.. "that's what i heard!"
Market segmentation... "All companies are Currupt"
Marketing strategy... tell every one "you lied 4 them
Marketing management.. Gather a group/gan of false "wittnesses"
Market dominance "that's my story and i'm sticking with it!"
Promotional content
Advertising • Branding • Underwriting
Direct marketing • Personal Sales
Product placement • Publicity Sales promotion • Sex in advertising
Word of mouth
Marketing
Promotion is one of the four elements of marketing mix
It is the communication link between sellers and buyers for the purpose of influencing informing,
or persuading a potential buyer's purchasing decision.[1]
The following are some types of Promotion
used in the Environmental chamber business,
at Thermotron, Russles technical products, Espec, Tenny chamber company, All Temp Engineering, and EST testing solutions.
lying,cheating,deceiving,defrauding,stealing, embezzling, and lible and slandering your co-workers
it was and is "OK" to steal and rob the customer or co-workers.. because every-one is like that
Originally a patriarch was a man who exercised autocratic authority as a pater familias over an extended family.
The system of such rule of families by senior males is called patriarchy.
This is a Greek word, a composition of πατήρ (pater) meaning "father" and ἄρχων (archon) meaning "leader", "chief", "ruler", "king", etc.
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are referred to as the three patriarchs of the people of Israel, and the period in which they lived is called the Patriarchal Age.
It originally acquired its religious meaning in the Septuagint version of the Bible.[1]
Hypocrisy is the act of persistently professing beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that are inconsistent with one's actions. Hypocrisy is thus a kind of lie.
The hypocrite thinks that what he or she usually professes does not somehow apply to him or her. It is not simply an inconsistency between what is praised or admired and what is done. Samuel Johnson made this point when he wrote about the misuse of the charge of "hypocrisy" in Rambler No. 14:
Nothing is more unjust, however common, than to charge with hypocrisy him that expresses zeal for those virtues which he neglects to practice; since he may be sincerely convinced of the advantages of conquering his passions, without having yet obtained the victory, as a man may be confident of the advantages of a voyage, or a journey, without having courage or industry to undertake it, and may honestly recommend to others, those attempts which he neglects himself.[1]
Will It Take a Balaam's Ass To Speak Before They'll Listen?
For most of my life I've professed Christ as my Savior, and for a number of those years I've also held to basic theology as what I believe to be the purest expression of the Christian faith.
Because of my own commitment to basic theology, and the lucidness with which expounds the Word of God, I've for years been appreciative of labors , some have motivated me in renewing my mind, Romans 12... .
Imagine my shock at discovering that the Dutch and Christian hollanders don't practice what it preaches.
Perhaps the most obvious example of that was the lawsuit against Hil Sysbesma.
I wouldn't think it necessary for a man like me with no formal biblical education to have to expound the Word of God to the Dutch and Christian Reformed ,Or the Roman Catholic church that dan j. Okeefe went to: but evidently that's the case.
Christians shouldn't be suing Christians. 1 Corinthians 6:1-7 not only states that plainly, it even explains why:
1 Does any one of you, when he has a case against his neighbor, dare to go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?
2 Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is judged by you, are you not competent to constitute the smallest law courts?
3 Do you not know that we shall judge angels? How much more, matters of this life?
4 If then you have law courts dealing with matters of this life, do you appoint them as judges who are of no account in the church?
5 I say this to your shame. Is it so, that there is not among you one wise man who will be able to decide between his brethren,
6 but brother goes to law with brother, and that before unbelievers?
7 Actually, then, it is already a defeat for you, that you have lawsuits with one another.
Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be defrauded? (1 Corinthians 6:1-7)
If these people didn't know the Bible well enough to have figured that out before, then they've probably figured it out by now (whether or not they're willing to admit it is a different matter altogether).
When Thomas Bannach was there.. he bragged he could lie and libel and slander his co-workers.. and avery one would believe his lies..
Hil sysbesma atributed .. his law suit.. directly to thomas Bannach.. and his "history" of defrauding his co-workers and trying to"BUILD A-CASE-AGAINST-THEM"
and Hil Sysbesma said "embezzlement was "really" stealing.. it is called "working the system"
After the criticism they've come under in the past years they could've figured it out without ever reading the Bible at all.
Even if as dutch and christian community had never seen 1 Corinthians 6 before, just good old common sense would've by now taught them that suing a fellow Christian isn't a smart move.
But even if I weren't a Christian (as some now ex post facto wish to allege in order to find some elusive biblical escape clause), or even if I were a "gay blade" as alleged, it would still have been an incredibly stupid move.
A good friend certainly seems to understand why Christians shouldn't sue Christians.
In a Study Bible it says:
6:1 Dare. Suing another believer in a secular law court is a daring act of disobedience because of its implications related to all sin -- the displeasure of God: a matter against another....
6:4 ...the basic meaning is clear; when Christians have earthly quarrels and disputes among themselves, it is inconceivable that they would turn to those least qualified (unbelievers) to resolve the matter.
6:5,6. Shame. Such conduct as suing a fellow believer is not only a sinful shame, but a complete failure to act obediently and righteously.
Christians who take fellow Christians to court suffer moral defeat and spiritual loss even before the case is heard, and they become subject to divine chastening.
6:7 why...not...accept wrong? ..
.Christians have no right to insist on legal recourse in a public court. It is far better to trust God's sovereign purpose in trouble and lose financially, than to be disobedient and suffer spiritually.
One of the reasons that we as Christians shouldn't "dare to go to law before the unrighteous" is because it's a lot like disrobing in front of strangers, or as others have put it, "it's like airing our dirty laundry for the whole world to see."
his defenders would argue that it was I who was responsible for airing dirty laundry by posting my articles on the internet.
Or as Thomas Pattersopn said"gee i don't want to say anything bad about the liars and thieves"
He'd argue that anyone in the world could see this dirty laundry and that the a backlash was merely a method of pulling the dirty laundry off the line.
In theory that might be true... in theory. In practice however that's completely ridiculous.
In order to search for something, anything, you first have to know that it exists.
Then you have to know how to search for it. , let alone any unbelievers. It's only because of manypeople now know, including a lot of unbelievers who should've never found out.
I'm in no way pleased that so many unbelievers have now found out. In fact I'm very troubled by it. But there's only one reason they did find out -- the lies.
However, the lies against me brought shame and reproach to the entire body of Christ
and it also reinforces the preexisting biases of many unbelievers that "the church is full of hypocrites."
As Gregory V Johnson said about Hil sysbesma and Thomas Bannach..
they are both liars and thieves and "GO 2 EACH-OTHERS-CHURCH !!"
OR AS .Bo Bjarno a Thermotron sales engineer.. said "THEY-R-ALL-PHONY"!!
As one "atheist (an agnostic when facing surgery)" put it:
do a little google. And lo, a whole can of worms came forth... and particularly slimy, wriggly ones at that, considering these Holland Michigan Dutch and Christian Reformed...
are supposed to be the 'moral' people.
criticisms are not only managerial, but spiritual and theological, and most people have been unafraid of saying so .
the leeches have battened onto the credulous faithful, There's defrocked priests,
in the Roman Catholic Church.. where Daniel J Okeefe goes ,
nepotism, hypocrisy and greed, and bad behaviour by the bucketful if you don't mind wading through the sanctimony.
It's interesting , because this religious business is trying limit the truth as it even happens.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
If they can do it, so can other , and a lot of Dutch and Christian church go'ers have a lot to hide.
God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.
29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,
30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;
31 they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless.
32 Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death,
they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
As Mitch Kerr from All temp Engineering said. "they are trying to fine DIRT on you.!!
Christians shouldn't be giving atheists (like John dane and mitch kerr)
cause to rejoice over sin and hypocrisy in the church.
But Thomas Bannach... says, it's OK... Beacuse they are all "CURRUPT"
and his clone said" it dosen't matter what you do to any one"
so lo9ng as you get away with it.. and you "make-it"
"From everything I've heard,
thomas bannach is a very corrupt man.
Some have told me that based on his behavior
they don't think there's any way he could be a converted Christian.
To have such a man in management is an embarrassment to the church of Jesus Christ."
it's self-evident that the man is as unfit
what are "false statements."
the judge would have to first determine if my allegations were false by examining various evidence and the testimony of witnesses.
As Randy Bunnn fromn the company "ENSECO" was told..
Thomas Bannach had many "false wittnesses"
Unfortunately there are still some who in their pride, and their blind defense won't take heed.
If there are those who remain sympathetic (and there are) the vast majority of them are smart enough to keep their unbiblical opinions to themselves.
2010 – Holland, MI- Thermotron Industries, North America’s leader in designing, manufacturing and marketing Environmental Test Equipment, announced the appointment of Ronald Lampen as its new President, effective March 31, 2010.
Mr. Lampen’s appointment was made after Daniel O’Keefe, the Company's COO and President for 29 years, made his decision to QUIT and hang out some where else where he might fit-in.
How well does your behavior match with what you deeply believe and value?
There are 40 behavioral indicators which test for your competency in behaving with integrity, responsibility, compassion and forgiveness. This inventory is designed for individuals and professionals who are in business or other organizational settings.
Personal Self-Assessment
Moral Competency Inventory
Please choose one rating in response to each statement. You will get the most value from this assessment if you respond honestly. It may be tempting to give yourself a high rating because the statement sounds positive, but please do your best to rate yourself accurately in terms of your beliefs or how you behave.
For your results to be accurately calculated, you must answer all of the items.
1. I can clearly state the principles, values and beliefs that guide my actions.
Never
Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
2. I tell the truth unless there is an overriding moral reason to withhold it.
Never
Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
3. I will generally confront someone if I see them doing something that isn’t right. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
4. When I agree to do something, I always follow through. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
5. When I make a decision that turns out to be a mistake, I admit it. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
6. I own up to my own mistakes and failures. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
7. My colleagues would say that I go out of my way to help them. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
8. My first response when I meet new people is to be genuinely interested in them. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
9. I appreciate the positive aspects of my past mistakes, realizing that they were valuable lessons on my way to success. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
10. I am able to "forgive and forget," even when someone has made a serious mistake. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
11. When faced with an important decision, I consciously assess whether the decision I wish to make is aligned with my most deeply held principles, values and beliefs. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
12. My friends know they can depend on me to be truthful to them. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
13. If I believe that my boss is doing something that isn’t right, I will challenge him or her. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
14. My friends and coworkers know they can depend on me to keep my word. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
15. When I make a mistake, I take responsibility for correcting the situation. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
16. I am willing to accept the consequences of my mistakes. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
17. My leadership approach is to lead by serving others. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
18. I truly care about the people I work with as people – not just as the “human capital” needed to produce results. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
19. I resist the urge to dwell on my mistakes. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
20. When I forgive someone, I find that it benefits me as much as it does them. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
21. My friends would say that my behavior is very consistent with my beliefs and values. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
22. My coworkers think of me as an honest person. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
23. If I knew my company was engaging in unethical or illegal behavior, I would report it, even if it could have an adverse effect on my career. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
24. When a situation may prevent me from keeping a promise, I consult with those involved to renegotiate the agreement. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
25. My coworkers would say that I take ownership for my decisions. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
26. I use my mistakes as an opportunity to improve my performance. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
27. I pay attention to the development needs of my coworkers. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
28. My coworkers would say that I am a compassionate person. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
29. My coworkers would say that I have a realistic attitude about my mistakes and failures. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
30. I accept that other people will make mistakes. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
31. My coworkers would say that my behavior is very consistent with my beliefs and values. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
32. I am able to deliver negative feedback in a respectful way. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
33. My coworkers would say that I am the kind of person who stands up for my convictions. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
34. When someone asks me to keep a confidence, I do so. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
35. When things go wrong, I do not blame others or circumstances. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
36. I discuss my mistakes with coworkers to encourage tolerance for risk. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
37. I spend a significant amount of my time providing resources and/or removing obstacles for my coworkers. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
38. Because I care about my coworkers, I actively support their efforts to accomplish important personal goals. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
39. Even when I have made a serious mistake in my life, I am able to forgive myself and move ahead. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
40. Even when people make mistakes, I continue to trust them. Never Infrequently Sometimes In Most Situations In All Situations
A. Your total MCI alignment score is: 35.5Score Ranking 90-100 Very High 80-89 High 60-79 Moderate 40-59 Low 20-39 Very Low
B. What Your MCI Alignment Score Means •Your total score is a measure of alignment. If your score is high, it is highly likely that you typically act in ways that are consistent with your beliefs and goals. If your score is low, it is likely that your typical behavior is out of synch with what you believe and what you want for yourself. •There are quite a few different ways to look at your MCI scores. No single interpretation is correct, and no "test" is the last word on your capabilities. We recommend that you reflect on each of these aspects of your MCI scores to see whether they trigger the self-awareness that is so crucial to ongoing moral development. •We think you will find your results to be interesting and illuminating. If there are aspects of the MCI interpretation that are confusing or don't make sense to you, then we trust that in the final analysis, you know yourself better than any assessment. That said, here are some ways to interpret your scores. •The maximum possible score is 100. A score of 100 would mean that you answered every item on the MCI with a "5" and would indicate that you believe you are completely competent in all ten moral competencies assessed by the inventory. Since no human being is perfect, a perfect score on the MCI might mean that you have some difficulty acknowledging areas of weakness. •The minimum score is 20. Most people have some degree of moral competency; therefore, low and very low scores may reflect excess self-criticism rather than genuine moral incompetence. In our experience, scores below 60 are extremely rare, most likely because corporate leaders do not succeed without some degree of moral competency. •MCI scores fall most frequently in the moderate range, between 60 and 79. •Your total MCI score is simply a snapshot of your overall moral competence. If you take the MCI every year or so, your total score can help you see whether your overall level of moral competence is increasing. •You may re-take this as often as you like. III. Highest and Lowest Competency Scores Your Highest Competencies Your Lowest Competencies Ability to let go of one’s own mistakes Admitting mistakes and failures Actively caring about others Taking responsibility for personal choices Ability to let go of others’ mistakes Embracing responsibility for serving others
Most people who complete the MCI have one or two moral competency scores that stand out as higher and lower than the bulk of the scores.
Do your highest scores fit your understanding of your own strengths?
If so, these are the competencies that you know how to use to maintain alignment and promote high performance. Are there any high scores that surprised you? If so, they may represent areas of strength that you had not been aware of and are competencies that can further help you to achieve your goals.
Do your lowest scores fit your understanding of where your weaknesses lie?
If so, you have an opportunity to develop your competencies if you decide that improvement in those competencies is important to you. Are there any low scores that surprised you? If so, they may represent blind spots that are keeping you from reaching your goals.
IV. Individual Item Scores High Scored Items (Rated 5 or 4) Item Score Item 5 Even when I have made a serious mistake in my life, I am able to forgive myself and move ahead 4 I accept that other people will make mistakes 4 I resist the urge to dwell on my mistakes
If you have a few scores of "5", those items may be areas of particular strength that you should recognize, appreciate, and use. If you have a majority of "5s", you may be extremely morally competent across the board, but you may also have overrepresented your strengths. People with very high scores across the board may need to solicit feedback from others to confirm the accuracy of their scores.
Low Scored Items (Rated 1, 2 or 3) Item Score Item 1 I truly care about the people I work with as people – not just as the 'human capital' needed to produce results 1 I spend a significant amount of my time providing resources and removing obstacles for my coworkers 1 My leadership approach is to lead by serving others 1 When things go wrong, I do not blame others or circumstances 1 My friends and coworkers know they can depend on me to keep my word 1 When I make a mistake, I take responsibility for correcting the situation 1 If I knew my company was engaging in unethical or illegal behavior, I would report it, even if it could have an adverse effect on my career 1 When a situation may prevent me from keeping a promise, I consult with those involved to renegotiate the agreement 1 I discuss my mistakes with coworkers to encourage tolerance for risk 1 When someone asks me to keep a confidence, I do so 1 I pay attention to the development needs of my coworkers 1 I use my mistakes as an opportunity to improve my performance 1 My coworkers would say that I take ownership for my decisions 1 If I believe that my boss is doing something that isn’t right, I will challenge him or her 1 I am willing to accept the consequences of my mistakes 1 I tell the truth unless there is an overriding moral reason to withhold it 1 Even when people make mistakes, I continue to trust them 1 I own up to my own mistakes and failures 1 When I make a decision that turns out to be a mistake, I admit it 1 I am able to 'forgive and forget,' even when someone has made a serious mistake
If you have some scores that are "2" or "1", what weaknesses do those items represent? Since most people who take the MCI have very few item scores below "3," low item scores usually represent wonderful opportunities for removing obstacles to high performance.
Take a look at the item scores for your highest and lowest competencies. Was your lowest competency score a result of midrange scores for each of the four related items, or was your competency score low because of one very low item score? If so, you may find that paying attention to that single aspect of the competency could greatly boost your competence in that area.
V. Do Your Scores Matter? All of the competencies included in the MCI are important, and all act synergistically. But realistically, we are all human and need to concentrate on developing the competencies that will have the most impact on ourselves and our organizations.
You already have decided whether your scores accurately reflect your areas of moral strength and weakness. At a deeper level, how well do your scores represent competency areas that are important to you? After all, you can be good or bad at things that you don't care about. So we encourage you to think about the extent to which the competencies identified are consistent with your moral compass and your goals.
If you have not read Moral Intelligence, you might find it useful in further exploring this subject. For information on how to order this book, click here.
VI. Reality Testing How much do you trust your self assessment of your moral competencies? Most of us have some degree of difficulty seeing ourselves as others see us.
As a reality test, we recommend that you share your MCI scores with one or two trusted friends or colleagues. Here are some questions you can ask them:
•How well do my strengths as reported on the MCI reflect your perception of my strengths? •How well do my weaknesses as reported on the MCI reflect your perception of my weaknesses? •Are there other moral competencies that you see as my strengths? •Are there other moral competencies that you see as weaknesses? •On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate me on integrity? •On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate me on responsibility? •On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate me on how well I show compassion? •On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate me on my capacity for forgiveness?
