Wednesday, December 17, 2008

yes the king really dosen't have any clothes on



You don't crown a guy king and then the king doesn't have any clothes on and you say, 'Hey, he's still the king.' ...






Pppp
COPYRITE-5-84

Peter F. Drucker in his book "The Effective Executive"


" It is the duty of the executive director to remove ruthlessly any one especially a manager who constantly or consistently fails to perform with high distinction.

To let such a man stay on corrupts the others...Indeed I have never seen anyone in a job for which he was inadequate who was not slowly being destroyed by the pressure and the strain, (like strain on the brain) and who did not secretly pray for deliverance. "

ed [ unless the director is a spineless liar and thief, and embezzler ]


(yes the king really dosen't have any clothes on!!)

Here comes the king in his latest clothes! Doesn't he look a treat! .... I can't wait to wear my clothes, and then we'll have some fun! Narrator 1 ...

Friday, December 12, 2008

Lying can be easy to do in the moment

Lying can be easy to do in the moment, but it can be very destructive in the long run, and we end up being bound and chained by the consequences. Does the truth really matter? Listen to the next edition of Truth For Life with Alistair Begg.

Recent Broadcasts

Title: The Truth Matters, Part B
Exodus 20:16

Series: Pathway to Freedom
more about this series >


by Alistair Begg | Monday, December 8, 2008
Listen Now:



Wednesday, December 3, 2008

I Was Only Borrowing It, Part A....... Exodus 20:15,







I Was Only Borrowing It, Part A
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Exodus 20:15, Series: Pathway to Freedom


You’ve probably heard every explanation in the book when it comes to stealing. But as far as God is concerned, stealing is stealing. On today’s broadcast of Truth For Life with Alistair Begg, we’ll learn more about stealing, and how it is more than taking a few office supplies.

Recent Broadcasts I Was Only Borrowing It, Part A


www.truthforlife.org/site/News2?abbr=lst&page=NewsArticle&id=8001&news_iv_ctrl=1102

when i was at thermotron i didn't even know of the word embezzler or how much "work" it takes.. but by the time i left.. it was a life style that was taught by the MANAGEMENT TEAM.. it just takes pratice
Exodus 20:15
Thou Shalt Not Steal


Ask the customer to borrw some equipment or your co-worker..
and "forget to return it!!"



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You shall not steal."

INTRODUCTION

The story is told of a shopkeeper who was trying to explain business ethics to his son. "Suppose you discover, after he has left, that a customer mistakenly gave you a $100.00 bill instead of a ten. Now, here is the most important question of business ethics: Should you tell your partner?"

In New York in the 1860's, gold was carried by messengers on Wall Street in open bags. When one burst, the bystanders formed a protective circle around the courier until he was able to pick it all up. Anyone leaning over got a swift kick in the rear from the others (Sobel, Panic on Wall Street. NY: MacMillan, 1986, p. 116).

Archaeologists tell us that in ancient Israel, the houses only had curtains across the doorways; their pagan neighbors had tight-fitting stone doors. Which kind of society would you rather live in?

Well, today even double-bolt locks won't keep the Enrons of the world from robbing you blind. It is time once again to come back to the basics, and surely one of them is "Thou shalt not steal."

I. THE BIBLICAL BASIS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY
The very prohibition of stealing implies the existence of private property rights. Unless someone has a right to something, I might reappropriate it but can hardly steal it.

Because the biblical view of the nature, meaning, and purpose of property is essential not only to understanding what stealing is but is also central to understanding human identity, we need to begin our study of the Eighth Commandment by laying the foundation here.

PEOPLE OWN THINGS BY RIGHT OF CREATION

In the first place, PEOPLE OWN THINGS BY RIGHT OF CREATION. God owns the whole universe and everything in it because He made it (Gen. 1:1).

David makes explicit the connection between ownership and creation in Ps. 24:1-2. The earth is the Lord's, and all it contains (v. 1).

Why? Because he has founded it upon the seas (v. 2).

You therefore have a right to determine the use of that which you make, which would include the right to exchange it for something else, which would then become your property as if you had made that. This right is absolute in the case of God, because He made everything out of nothing. We must always get the materials for what we make somewhere else, ultimately from Him, sometimes through others. So our ownership is always derivative and conditional.

But because we are the creative animal made in His image, the energy and intelligence we add to that material gives us a proprietary interest in it, derived from His. In that sense, labor is the foundation of all wealth. Since I cannot eat my lectures and sermons, nor wear them, nor live in them, nor drive them, I exchange them for money--symbolic wealth--that I can use to purchase those other things. The factory worker cannot eat the car he makes either, so he is in the same position. He in effect sells the proprietary interest his labor gives him in the car back to the factory, which pays him for it in the form of a salary and benefits, at a rate which they have agreed on. (Those who are learned in these matters may notice a superficial resemblance to the Marxist labor theory of wealth. This should not surprise us, because Marxism is after all a Christian heresy).

So we see that creativity is the basis of property--I did not make everything I own, but my right to own it flows back to something I did make, to my own creative activity and labor.

PEOPLE OWN THINGS BY RIGHT OF STEWARDSHIP

In the second place, PEOPLE OWN THINGS BY RIGHT OF STEWARDSHIP. A steward is a servant who manages someone else's property for the benefit of the owner.

Well, God put Adam into the Garden of Eden to rule over it (Gen. 1:26) and to take care of it and develop it, to "cultivate" it (2:15). God owns everything by right of creation, and he has entrusted some of it to me to manage on his behalf.

Property then is a way of speaking about that particular chunk of creation over which I personally exercise my little part of the original Adamic dominion as God's steward. Ownership then has to do with dominion, control, and most of all with responsibility.

For the Christian, then, ownership IS stewardship. Because I was made to be God's steward, responsibility to Him for the cultivation and use of his creation is the thing that fulfills my nature. Through my labor (or through gift or inheritance) I therefore seek the right to be responsible for a larger part of that creation. To say that I "own" my car is to say that it is the car for which I am responsible to God, it and not another.

I am not responsible for Todd's little car--to maintain it, to make the payments on it, to see that it is used for the benefit of my family and God's people and for His glory because it is really HIS car. I am responsible for mine.

If I run off with Todd's car without asking his permission, what have I done? I have usurped an area of responsibility that God has given to him, not to me. And because responsibility to God is the thing we were created for and which therefore fulfills our natures, I have "stolen" from him, not just a piece of highly organized metal, but a part of his very created and creative identity. He may not recognize this--he may be thinking materialistically that it is just a car, a thing, a means of transportation. But that is still what I have done, nevertheless.

Why then is stealing wrong?

Because God recognizes this basic law of stewardship and will not allow one person to usurp authority and responsibility that He has given to another.

That's what stealing ultimately is: not just taking material things but usurping responsibility. Therefore, we have the Eighth Commandment: "Thou shalt not steal."

This biblical justification of private property rights flows inevitably from the doctrines of creation and the image of God, but some people see a biblical objection to it. What, they ask, about the Jerusalem "commune" of Acts 2:44, when the early saints "had everything in common"?

It is clear from a careful look at the whole context that this was not a divine mandate or even ideal, but an emergency measure for a very special crisis. Thousands of people had just been saved who were not residents of Jerusalem but Diaspora Jews from all over the Empire. Before they could be sent back home they had to be discipled.

To be discipled they had to be housed and fed by a small group of about five hundred. But the story of Annanias and Saphira shows that the principle of private individuals being responsible for what God had given them was not overturned. This couple sold a piece of property and pretended to give all the proceeds to the apostles, while actually keeping some back for themselves. It is clear from Acts 5:4 that their sin was not in keeping some of the money, but only in lying about it. Peter upholds their right to manage what God had given them as they thought best.

To summarize, creation produces a relationship between labor and responsibility. Property is then simply one's sphere of responsibility expressed in physical or financial terms. It lawfully comes to us by labor, by investment, by inheritance, or by gift. (Labor is the most basic, for all the other forms depend on somebody's labor at some point.) To take it in other ways is stealing. And this is wrong because nobody has the right to usurp responsibility that God has given to another.

II. SOME FORMS OF THEFT

Once we realize that property is simply a form of responsibility under God for a part of His creation, then we can see that stealing involves a lot more than shoplifting, mugging somebody, burglary, embezzlement, or extortion. Any usurpation of another's responsibility is theft. But since everything is owned by God and we are responsible to Him, any failure to fulfill our responsibilities under God can be considered a form of theft. Here are a few we don't often think about.

First, the failure to give an honest day's work for a day's pay is a form of stealing. (The failure to give an honest day's pay for a day's work is too, but as we don't have any CEO's in our congregation we will concentrate on the former.)

Studies have shown that the average American worker only puts in about two productive hours for every eight he spends on the job. This steals not only from his employer but also from every consumer who must pay for his laziness in the form of higher prices.

Next let us consider shoplifting, cheating on income taxes, and office theft.

Why do I lump these problems together? Because they all involve stealing from an institution rather than from an individual.

And therefore many people's consciences simply do not bother them for these acts--the facelessness of the victim renders these thieves incapable of imagining that what they are doing is really stealing. Therefore we need to make the point that it is just as wrong. Again, in the aggregate it steals from everybody in the form of inflated prices and higher taxes.

Next we come to that grand old childhood maxim, "Finders keepers, losers weepers." Not only is this a very uncharitable approach, but it is forbidden explicitly--even if the loser is your enemy, so how much more if he is your neighbor. "If you meet your enemy's ox or his donkey wandering away, you shall surely return it to him" (Ex. 23:4).

Finally, since property is responsibility, any failure to meet your obligations under God is really a form of stealing. Think of it in terms of obligation: Fathers owe their families godly leadership by example; children owe honor and obedience to their parents and teachers; all believers owe the Gospel to their neighbors (Rom. 1:4). Not paying what you owe is a passive form of stealing. So you may never have taken one red cent that did not belong to you, but if you shirk these responsibilities under God, you are a thief and a robber, just as surely as if you had robbed a 7-11, knocked over a liquor store, snatched a purse, burgled a house, or mugged a pedestrian.

III. SOME FINAL THOUGHTS

Why do we wrestle with this issue? Stealing in all its forms, from the grandest larceny to the pettiest theft, flows from two attitude problems. First is a failure to trust in God's providence. We are greedy and grasping because we are insecure, and we are insecure because of our lack of faith.

But consider the lilies of the field, how they grow--they neither toil nor spin, and yet your Father clothes them. Second is a failure to understand the role of responsibility in our lives and its relationship to fulfillment. If you think you want Things, you find that you never have enough.

Why?

Because it is not things that fulfill us, but what they represent. Godly dominion is the most fulfilling experience you will ever have, because it is what you were made for. Stealing is self defeating, because it destroys the very reason why property exists in the first place. To gratefully accept from our Father increasing responsibility--because we have been faithful in little things--to manage for Him an ever larger piece of His creation, for the glory of His name, the good of His people, and the spread of His Gospel--that is what you were made for! If that is not true then creation is not true, the image of God is not true, the Bible is not true; let us eat, drink, and be merry, and spend everything on ourselves, for tomorrow we die.

By contrast with this, greed, selfishness, and every irresponsible form of getting and spending is the path of boredom, anxiety, meaninglessness, and death.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

we R NEVER ..wRoNGggg... ass-hole



who ever tells them what they want to hear is RIGHT








AsK.. DAVE WATERfield.. former National Field service Manager..



or how about low life RON Wiley

Thursday, October 23, 2008

"If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried."




at THERMOTRON IT IS BETTER TO LET SOMEONE ELSE DO IT!!

u DON'T WANT 2 GET INTO TROUBLE or blamed !!









WHAT!!! ME MAKE A DECISION??,,, NO WAY.. I MIGHT BE WRONG!!







"If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you were even THERE!!."

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

The dutchboy Religious Holland Michigan Whore manager







The dutchboy Religious manager

conspired to defraud his co-workers;

and if someone didn't go along with the stories (support his lies)
he would point suspicion about them by saying things like,

"they have a problem".

Uuuuu has overlooked the character of a liar; a liar will:

1.lie,

2.cheat,

3.steal and embezzle,

4.slander,

5.murder,

6.lead people astray,

7.blame it on someone else,

8.deny it,

9.then lie about it.






Everyone wishes everyone else's discrediting, demotion, and ruin;

everyone is an expert in the confidential report, the pretended alliance, the stab in the back.

Over all this their good manners, their expressions of grave respect,

their "tributes" to one another's invaluable services form a thin crust.

Every now and then it gets punctured, and the scalding lava of their hatred spurts out.

Seems that ole A.G. has taken a strange tack here.

I used to think that I had missed something by not moving directly from college into the weird world of neckties & suits & shoulderpads & high heels..

That is, until I got the last few jobs.

Now I can see that I didn't miss anything. That I was blessed to have taken the narrow winding path instead.

My recent leap right smack into the world of mainstream has been a Piss-in-Your-Pants sort of exp.

Really! A non-stop journey through the Twilight Zone.

Astonishingly illuminating. Naturally, my response has been sharp and merciless.

It takes a good grip not to get sucked into the machinery.


But anyway, Jung said if you become highly individualized
(free thinker) , you can become independent of the mass consciousness.

It is these liberated individuals- who live outside the circle of the druid dance- who sometimes change the course of human history. (the Lutheran religion started thus)

Tis the hermits and pilgrims and magicians that will save us, if anyone can.

So, A.G., this is what I think:
There are two kinds of critics.

There are critics motivated by poison and insanity who criticize with the intention of causing pain (read Mein Kampf by A. Hitler);

and there are critics motivated by an intense optimism [now rare] who criticize for the sake of awakening rapture (read Island by A. Huxley).


I hallucinate that I am of the latter type. Thanks for your concern. What I'm doing is necessary to my voyage. Sorry it's so weird.

Being a Seeker-of-Truth is a difficult path to walk, people want to hear what they want to hear... and what do they want to hear?

That they are fine, good, clever, smart and successful whom we all have a great deal of respect for.

ed. [Seeking human respect can be fatal, a fatal error]

The games that people play, reinforce whatever social rules they are trying to fulfil; Whatever dream or image they are trying to promote.


Big John the Tindink early on dramatized the game of deceit at one weasel factory I worked.
In the effort to hide his backstabbing and defrauding his co-workers he would say :



"Old Bob is as Smart as a Fox.


Old Bob the Original "First Ever" National Manager. You might say he was

" the Godfather " of the "I Lied for You "

Good Old Boy's Club in the environmental chamber industry.

So, lets take a look at his Character and the business methods he employed.

welll maybe not 2 day... but remember U...2... can be a whore

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

ASSUMPTION OF RISK AND RELEASE FORM

ASSUMPTION OF RISK AND RELEASE FORM

THIS IS A RELEASE OF LEGAL RIGHTS – READ AND UNDERSTAND BEFORE SIGNING


Name of employee : __________________________________________________

Date of Birth: _________________________
(If under 18 years of age, a parent or legal guardian must also read and sign this form.)

Organization: THE_ moRON _ Mentoring SENIOR Program

I hereby agree as follows:

1. Risks of Participation.

I fully recognize that there may be risks to which I may be exposed by participating in thIS project. I understand that the_mo_ron and its governing board, officers, employees, and agents (collectively the “COMPANY”) does require me to participate in the Program, but I want to do so, despite the possible risks and despite this Release. I therefore agree to assume and take on myself all of the risks and responsibilities in any way associated with the service project. I understand that I am responsible for wearing proper attire for the activities and weather.

2. Health & Safety.

I understand and agree that the COMPANY does not have medical personnel available at the service site which is the location for my participation in the service project. Furthermore, I understand that the nearest medical facility could be up to thirty minutes from the site. I understand and agree that the COMPANY is granted permission to authorize emergency medical treatment, if necessary, and that such action by the COMPANY shall be subject to the terms of this Agreement. I understand and agree that the COMPANY assumes no responsibility for any injury, damage or cost which might arise out of or in connection with such authorized emergency medical treatment.

I have consulted with a medical doctor with regard to my personal medical needs. There are no health-related reasons or problems that preclude or restrict my participation in this service project. I am aware that I need to inform the COMPANY of any medical conditions which may affect my participation in the program and I agree that while participating in this project, I am responsible for taking any prescription medications as directed by my physician.

The COMPANY provides excess accident insurance covering medical expenses for EMPLOYEE'S while on travel status, and for doing work for the COMPANY. The coverage is automatic, has specific limits and exclusions, and is in excess of any other applicable insurance.

I understand that neither ...

I understand that I am expected to carry liability insurance coverage.

I agree that I have elected to provide my transportation to or have elected to pool with a participant.

3. Standards of Conduct

I will comply with the rules, standards and instructions for behavior, including, as well as the agency’s standards of conduct.

I understand that I am permitted to consume alcohol, possess/use illegal substances or weapons, or engage in sexual/illicit behavior while participating in activities.

I understand that violation of a policy will result in my further sanctioning .

I waive and release all claims against the COMPANY that arise at the time when I am not under the direct supervision or that are caused by my failure to remain under such supervision or to comply with such rules, standards, and instructions.



4. Assumption of Risk, Covenant Not To Sue, and Release of Claims. Knowing the risks described above, and in consideration of being permitted to participate in the Program,

I agree, on behalf of my family, heirs, and personal representative(s), to assume all the risks and responsibilities surrounding my participation . To the maximum extend permitted by law, I release, indemnify, and covenant not to sue from and against any present or future claim, loss or liability for injury to person or property which I may suffer, or for which I may be liable to any other person, during my participation (including periods in transit).

I have carefully read this Release Form before signing it. No representations, statements, or inducements, oral or written, apart from the foregoing written statement, have been made. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state , which shall be the forum for any lawsuits filed under or incident to this agreement or to the Program.


x_____________________________ _______________
Signature of Participant Date


Emergency Contact Information

Name : __________________________________ Telephone: ____________________

Address: ________________________________________________ Email: ________________________


Please list any environmental allergies here:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please list any other medical conditions of which we should be aware here:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sunday, September 28, 2008

B whOooo U want 2 Bbbbb.. daniel j okeefe.. YES man, Opps YES SIR !!







1. Persuasion: Theory and Research
Our Low Price: $61.95
Availability: Temporarily sold out. Order now to get in line.
FREE SHIPPING
Available from other merchants - Low Price: $55.75

Author: Daniel J. O'Keefe Publisher: Sage Publications
Publish Date: 4/10/2007 Format: Paperback


Or maybe more?? IF we can SCREW.. UU 2.. what a deal!!



3. Persuasion: Theory and Research
Our Low Price: $101.95
Availability: In Stock: Usually Ships in 1 to 2 business days
FREE SHIPPING
Available from other merchants - Low Price: $86.11
Author: Daniel J. O'Keefe Publisher: Sage Publications
Publish Date: 4/10/2007 Format: Hardcover






Daniel J. O'Keefe (b. 1950) is an American communication and argumentation theory scholar.

He is a Professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Northwestern University.[1] His contributions to the argumentation field include summarizing research indicating that persuasive success and normatively-good argumentation are not mutually exclusive.

O'Keefe is the author of Persuasion: Theory and Research (ISBN 0-761-92539-2), a best-selling review of empirical research.

His work has also been published in Human Communication Research, Communication Monographs, Communication Theory, Communication Yearbook, Journal of the American Forensic Association, Quarterly Journal of Speech, and Argumentation and Advocacy.




Daniel J. O’Keefe Professor
Department of Communication Studies
Northwestern University


MORAL FIBER.... fib..fib.. ber




Revelation 21 (New Living Translation)


8 “But cowards, unbelievers, the corrupt, murderers, the immoral, those who practice witchcraft, idol worshipers, and all liarstheir fate is in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.”

Friday, September 26, 2008

CALIForNIA...jump on IT .. before it .. gooooes away



The freezing of motion has a long and fascinating history in photography, whether of sports, fashion or war. But rarely has stop-action been used in the unlikely, whimsical and often mischievous ways that Philippe Halsman employed it.







Dynamic barber jobs | MySpace JobsJob search for Dynamic Barber jobs at MySpace Jobs. ... Thermotron Industries - New Jersey. Industries is seeking a dynamic Field Service Technician to . ...be .. an...ASS- HOLE..

A V.F. Social-Service Feature

Know Your Asshole Footprint

Regrettably, some Americans are simply not aware of how large an asshole footprint they leave on the planet. Here, Vanity Fair offers a questionnaire that will help such individuals determine the size and breadth of their footprint.

If you answer "yes" to four or more of the questions for your age group, it is incumbent upon you to take urgent measures to reduce your asshole footprint.










Thursday, September 25, 2008

holland michigan whore training

People of the Lie

Written in 1983, People of the Lie: The Hope For Healing Human Evil (ISBN 0671454927) followed on from Peck's first book.
Peck describes the stories of several people who came to him whom he found particularly resistant to any form of help.

He came to think of them as evil and goes on to describe the characteristics of evil in psychological terms, proposing that it could become a psychiatric diagnosis.


He gives some identifying characteristics for evil persons. Discussed below are Scott Peck's views.

Evil is described by Peck as "militant ignorance". In this it is close to the original Judeo-Christian concept of "sin" as a consistent process that leads to failure to reach one's true goals.

An evil person:

Projects his or her evils and sins onto others and tries to remove them from others
Maintains a high level of respectability and lies incessantly in order to do so
Is consistent in his or her sins. Evil persons are characterized not so much by the magnitude of their sins, but by their consistency
Is unable to think from other people's viewpoints.
Most evil people realize the evil deep within themselves but are unable to tolerate the pain of introspection or admit to themselves that they are evil. Thus, they constantly run away from their evil by putting themselves in a position of moral superiority and putting the locus of evil on others. Evil is an extreme form of what Scott Peck, in The Road Less Traveled, calls a character disorder.

In a discussion on group evil, Peck talks about the My Lai Massacre tragedy during the Vietnam war:

In the spring of 1972 I was chairman of a committee of three psychiatrists appointed by the Army Surgeon General, at the request of the Chief of Staff of the Army, to make recommendations for research that might shed light on the psychological causes of MyLai, so as to help prevent such atrocities in the future. The research we proposed was rejected by the General Staff of the Army, reportedly on the grounds that it could not be kept secret and might prove embarrassing to the administration and that "further embarrassment was not desirable at that time". (Chapter 6, "MyLai: An Examination of Group Evil")

Peck makes great efforts to keep much of his discussion on a scientific basis.

He says that evil arises out of free choice.

He describes it thus: Every person stands at a crossroads, with one path leading to God, and the other path leading to the devil.

The path of God is the right path, and accepting this path is akin to submission to a higher power.

However, if a person wants to convince himself and others that he has free choice, he would rather take a path which cannot be attributed to its being the right path.

Thus, he chooses the path of evil.

Peck's writings on evil are to some extent based on accounts of apparent demonic possession and exorcism by Malachi Martin. However the veracity of these accounts has been questioned (see Fr. Richard Woods OP, National Catholic Reporter, April 29, 2005






The four stages
Scott Peck postulates that there are four stages of human spiritual development:

Stage I is chaotic, disordered, and reckless.
Very young children are in Stage I.

They tend to defy and disobey, and are unwilling to accept a will greater than their own. Many thermotron criminals are people who have never grown out of Stage I.

Stage II is the stage at which a person has blind faith.

Once children learn to obey their parents, they reach Stage II.

Many so-called holland michigan whores are religious people and essentially Stage II people, in the sense that they have blind faith in some God, and do not question His existence.

With blind faith comes humility and a willingness to obey and serve.

The majority of good law-abiding citizens never move out of Stage II.


Stage III is the stage of scientific skepticism and inquisitivity.

A Stage III person does not accept things on faith but only accepts them if convinced logically. Many people working in scientific and technological research are in Stage III.

Stage IV is the stage where an individual starts enjoying the mystery and beauty of nature.

While retaining skepticism, he starts perceiving grand patterns in nature.

His religiousness and spirituality differ significantly from that of a Stage II person, in the sense that he does not accept things through blind faith but does so because of genuine belief.

Stage IV people are labelled as Mystics.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

I m GONA B som--body !!! thermotron training




Beginning steps in B..ing .. a HOLLAND MICHIGAN WHORE !!


HHHOLLAND High school, I felt, was a time of huge changes and growth.

I learned new things, got good grades, made great friends, and gained amazing memories.

I also noticed my mind opening up to many possibilities in my life, and where they could take me.

In the same ways I believe thermotron college will be similar.
However, the lifestyle and habits that come with it may be drastically different.

First of all, without Mom around to cook you dinner every night and tell you to eat your vegetables, it is easy to fall into unhealthy eating habits.

This should be avoided. Just, try to make healthier choices, like grilled instead of fried, wheat instead of white, juice instead of soda.

Exercise is vital as well, and luckily the university has an incredible Recreation Center right down the street.

A strong, healthy body is key to a strong, healthy mind, and a strong, healthy mind is a must at the U & i ver-A-City of THE_mo_RON.


Mind over matter was Mao Zedong's idea that rural peasants could be "proletarianized" so they could lead the revolution and China could move from feudalism to socialism. It departs from Leninism in that the revolutionaries are peasants, instead of the urban proletariat.

"Mind over matter" was also a phrase popularized during the 1960s and 1970s.

It originally was used in reference to paranormal phenomena such as extra-sensory perception and psychokinesis.

However, it has also been used in reference to mind-centric spiritual and philosophic doctrines such as responsibility assumption. It is the belief that the mind is more powerful than the body.

Specifically, mind over matter refers to controlling pain that you may or may not be experiencing, such as holding your hand under extremely hot water and feeling no pain.

Also, "self-help" personalities such as Tony Robbins claim that, through the power of concentration and "positive thinking", people can walk on hot coals without getting burned.

This claim is made despite the fact that there are solid, scientific explanations for firewalking.

The phrase is present in the 2000s as well, usually used as slogan by hackers and hacker sites.



Thursday, September 18, 2008

blow Uuuu away

Thermotron may just >>>>>>.......



Need a lesson in love? Check out Quagmire's dating tips and videos. Who knows? The Q-man might actually have good advice.




I am so busy doing nothing... that the idea of doing anything - which as you know, always leads to something - cuts into the nothing and then forces me to have to drop everything.
Jerry Seinfeld



DON'T BLOW IT.... field service technician



If it bleeds, we can kill it.
Arnold Schwarzenegger





Smokers Blow Away Antioxidants That Protect Against Heart Disease
Smokers Blow Away Antioxidants That Protect Against Heart Disease New York (MedscapeWire) May 16 — Cigarette smoking is hard on the arteries, according to ...

News, Medscape Medical News, May 2000




Hiccups - Emergency Medicine
The term hiccup derives from the sound of the event. Hiccough erroneously implies an association with respiratory reflexes. The medical term, singultus, is ...

eMedicine Clinical Reference, Updated Continually




What we face may look insurmountable. But I learned something from all those years of training and competing. I learned something from all those sets and reps when I didn't think I could lift another ounce of weight. What I learned is that we are always stronger than we know.
Arnold Schwarzenegger


Monday, September 15, 2008

HELP get the JOB Done





Salary/Wage: 2 B determined

Compettitve Base pay + Incentive Status: Full Time, Employee

Job Category: Installation/Maintenance/Repair Occupations: Equipment

Install/Maintain/Repair;HVAC;General/Other: Installation/Maintenance/Repair

Relevant Work Experience: 2+ to 5 Years Career Level: Experienced (Non-Manager)

Industry: Aerospace and Defense;Electronics, Components, and Semiconductor


Mfg;Manufacturing - Other Education Level: Vocational